Chairman Nunes Made Material Changes to Memo Before Transmitting to White House, Without Knowledge of Committee Members
There is no basis under House Rules for releasing the altered memo provided to the White House since it was not approved by the Committee
Washington, DC – Today, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, sent a letter to HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) after discovering that the memo transmitted to the White House for review had been materially altered from the original version voted on by the Committee and presented to House Members the previous week. While the changes do not correct the profound distortions and inaccuracies found in the Nunes memo, they are changes that Committee members were “never apprised of, never had the opportunity to review, and never approved.”
Because the Majority no longer stands behind its original document and “felt it necessary to deceive Committee Members during Monday’s vote,” the process under Rule X must restart, the Committee must withdraw its request of the White House, and a new vote must be held to release to the public the altered memo.
The full letter is below:
Dear Chairman Nunes:
This evening, the Committee Minority discovered that the classified memorandum shared by the Committee Majority with the White House is not, in fact, the same document that Members of the House of Representatives have been reviewing since January 18, 2018 and which the Committee Majority voted on Monday to release to the public, over objections from the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Upon our discovery that the document sent for public review had been secretly altered, the Majority belatedly afforded the Minority an opportunity this evening to compare the document transmitted on Monday night by the Majority to the White House with the document made available to all House Members since January 18. After reviewing both versions, it is clear that the Majority made material changes to the version it sent to the White House, which Committee Members were never apprised of, never had the opportunity to review, and never approved.
This is deeply
While the Majority’s changes do not correct the profound distortions and inaccuracies in your document, they are nonetheless substantive. The fact that the Majority found it necessary to make these changes without informing the Committee during the vote signifies that the Committee Majority no longer stands by the representation it has made to House Members in its original document and felt it necessary to deceive Committee Members during Monday’s vote, by withholding the fact that it planned to send a different document to the White House.
As you may recall, Representative Himes asked you specifically to confirm that it was
THE CHAIRMAN: Only—yeah. It is to make the content available, is what we will do.
MR. HIMES: Again, we all reviewed a memo with specific words, as did Members of Congress. That memo contained any number of references to highly classified information. So I guess what I am looking for, is that memo word for word to be made public, or will it be redacted or altered in any way?
THE CHAIRMAN: Well, as the gentleman knows, we will send the content over to the White House, and the President has five days to either agree with us that it should be made public, or the President could say that he does not want it made public.
This response was deliberately misleading. Because there were material changes made to the document unbeknownst to Committee Members and only revealed to us this evening, two days after the vote, there is no longer a valid basis for the White House to review the altered document, since this new version is not the same document shared with the entire House and on which Committee Members voted.
It is now imperative that the Committee Majority immediately withdraw the document that